<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SharePoint search: good or bad?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.iaplay.com/2008/11/27/sharepoint-search/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.iaplay.com/2008/11/27/sharepoint-search/</link>
	<description>the good life in a digital age</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 11:44:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sharon</title>
		<link>http://www.iaplay.com/2008/11/27/sharepoint-search/comment-page-1/#comment-59496</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 11:48:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iaplay.com/2008/11/27/sharepoint-search/#comment-59496</guid>
		<description>Hi, I guess I must have not been clear on the day, I certainly didn&#039;t mean to give the impression that the fault lies purely with users.  The only direct user issue is using broad search queries such as form against a large index. (If you&#039;ve got 000s of forms, relevance is going to be a lucky dip if &#039;form&#039; is all the there is to go on.) The rest of the issues usually occur through content and linguistic issues.

The key message was to explain why you can&#039;t get Google-like searching internally.  On the Internet, if Google can&#039;t find you, nobody can. That&#039;s a pretty strong incentive for people to use all sorts of search engine optimisation (SEO) tactics. Google doesn&#039;t worry about security or permissions - if it&#039;s open to everyone it&#039;s indexed, if not it isn&#039;t. I rarely come across an organisation that has considered applying SEO internally or has opened up access to all their information. They face a different set of challenges when trying to improve search. 

Hope that helps a little.

p.s. Got to chuckle, came across this post whilst searching for some info on improving people search... :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I guess I must have not been clear on the day, I certainly didn&#8217;t mean to give the impression that the fault lies purely with users.  The only direct user issue is using broad search queries such as form against a large index. (If you&#8217;ve got 000s of forms, relevance is going to be a lucky dip if &#8216;form&#8217; is all the there is to go on.) The rest of the issues usually occur through content and linguistic issues.</p>
<p>The key message was to explain why you can&#8217;t get Google-like searching internally.  On the Internet, if Google can&#8217;t find you, nobody can. That&#8217;s a pretty strong incentive for people to use all sorts of search engine optimisation (SEO) tactics. Google doesn&#8217;t worry about security or permissions &#8211; if it&#8217;s open to everyone it&#8217;s indexed, if not it isn&#8217;t. I rarely come across an organisation that has considered applying SEO internally or has opened up access to all their information. They face a different set of challenges when trying to improve search. </p>
<p>Hope that helps a little.</p>
<p>p.s. Got to chuckle, came across this post whilst searching for some info on improving people search&#8230; <img src='http://www.iaplay.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

