content management

reasons to define a SharePoint content type

As a  general principle it is best not to go overboard on defining SharePoint content types. They add power to information retrieval but also add content creation overheads. Keep the number of types reasonable and also the number of metadata fields. (Obviously the art is defining what ‘reasonable’ means)

A list of reasons to define a specific content type:

  • you want to attach a document template for that content type
  • there’s a standard workflow for that content type
  • there’s a standard info policy for that content type
  • you want properties of the content type to be possible to search through advanced search
  • you want to restrict a search to that content type
  • you want to be able to sort a list or library by a specific metadata field of the content type
  • you want to categorise a list or library by a specific metadata field of the content type

See also Microsoft’s Managing enterprise metadata with content types

content management
metadata
sharepoint

Comments (0)

Permalink

content management resources

Debora emailed asking for resources about content management from an IA perspective.

I had a rummage around and created a quick list of content management books, presentations, and websites. Plus a short flurry of content strategy links as quite a few of the interesting structured content debates seem to have moved that way (is that a sympton of all IAs being UX designers these days?)

content management
information architecture

Comments (0)

Permalink